Go Back   JeepBBS > Discussion Battleground > Jeep Friends Forum
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Jeep Friends Forum This is a forum for jeep friends to hang out. For more formal atmosphere hop over to the Technical Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-08-2003, 07:20 AM
William William is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,277
Anyone know anything about Vovlo's?

Realibility, etc?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-08-2003, 07:32 AM
Jerry Bransford Jerry Bransford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Escondido, California
Posts: 1,238
William, I've only owned one Volvo, a 242GL, and that was my first and last Volvo. I bought it new in the late seventies and it was the least reliable car I've ever owned. I stranded me at least three times on Orange County freeways, twice on the Garden Grove freeway alone. It had fuel injection problems that the dealer was never able to fully cure. It turned out to be a very comfortable POS. I'm sure they're better now but my experience was not a good one.
__________________
See the Geezer II Jeep at
http://www.greentractortalk.com/jerryb/index.htm
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-08-2003, 07:54 AM
Desert Fox Desert Fox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 222
Cool

William,

I owned two during the late 70's and early 80's, both were station wagons with four banger engines.
Here are a few words and phrases that sum up my experiences with Volvos during that period. Built like a tank. Underpowered and slow. They ran about 80K miles without a problem, then overnight, things started going wrong. The clutch went, the water pump went, and on one of them the entire electrical system had to be replaced. I drove both of them about 120K miles. I never bought another one. My wife loved both of the Volvos. She thought they were the best cars we ever owned. Enough said.

Fred
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-08-2003, 09:41 AM
William William is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,277
Hmm. I wonder if the 97 and newer ones fair any better.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-08-2003, 10:05 AM
Anders Karlsson Anders Karlsson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: La Crescenta, CA
Posts: 142
Volvo has a club for million mile cars, here is the current leader.

http://www.hillmanimages.com/912/081801_467.html

Other high mileage cars.

http://www.carolinavolvo.com/high_milage_page.htm

I've always heard that Volvo's are very reliable, where I'm from they are used as taxicabs and emergency vehicles.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-08-2003, 10:20 AM
Paradiddle Paradiddle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 3,190
My brothers wife has a Volvo - it has become a maintanence nightmare - leaky things - same stuff Jerry said.

Jeff
__________________
Now I've always been puzzled by the yin and the yang - It'll come out in the wash, but it always leaves a stain
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-08-2003, 10:29 AM
Jerry Bransford Jerry Bransford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Escondido, California
Posts: 1,238
One more thing I remembered William... the cost of parts for my Volvo was not much shy of astronomical. Just one example... its water pump went out in 1981 and the dealer wanted $140 in 1981 dollars, $140 for just for the pump itself and not including labor. Luckily I found an honest independent Volvo garage who knew that a $17 Ford waterpump would bolt up perfectly and work just as well. Everything seemed to cost 3X what seemed reasonable at the time.

If it's not something like a Jeep, Toyota, or Honda, I'm just a little gun-shy of the cost of maintaining some vehicle brands. What's almost funny is my wife's sister and her husband own one of the largest Volvo dealerships in Michigan.
__________________
See the Geezer II Jeep at
http://www.greentractortalk.com/jerryb/index.htm
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-08-2003, 10:49 AM
William William is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,277
Quote:
Originally posted by Paradiddle
My brothers wife has a Volvo - it has become a maintanence nightmare - leaky things - same stuff Jerry said.

Jeff
What model?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-08-2003, 11:20 AM
Anders Karlsson Anders Karlsson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: La Crescenta, CA
Posts: 142
Quote:
[i]If it's not something like a Jeep, Toyota, or Honda, I'm just a little gun-shy of the cost of maintaining some vehicle brands. [/B]
Jeep, Toyota and Honda in the same sentence, now that's funny.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-08-2003, 11:30 AM
Jerry Bransford Jerry Bransford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Escondido, California
Posts: 1,238
Quote:
Originally posted by Anders Karlsson
Jeep, Toyota and Honda in the same sentence, now that's funny.
Oddly enough and as funny as it may seem to some, I've actually had what some may characterize as amazing reliability out of the four Jeeps my wife and I have owned. Much better than my previous maintenance nightmares including my BMW, Mercedes Benz, Volvo, VW Dasher, and wife's Mitsubishi. Thankfully, all are history.
__________________
See the Geezer II Jeep at
http://www.greentractortalk.com/jerryb/index.htm
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-08-2003, 11:53 AM
Paradiddle Paradiddle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 3,190
Quote:
Originally posted by William
What model?
Not sure - the sedan - probably a 90s vintage. She had a newer one that she drove in college but the radiator blew on the road and toasted the engine.

They are nice cars - I've rented them on trips a couple times and they work. If I was going European I'd go Benz or BMW first.
__________________
Now I've always been puzzled by the yin and the yang - It'll come out in the wash, but it always leaves a stain
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-08-2003, 03:39 PM
Overkill Overkill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 146
Send a message via AIM to Overkill Send a message via Yahoo to Overkill
All I know about Volvo's is that I really want Volvo portal axles under my rig!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-08-2003, 03:43 PM
speaceman speaceman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,019
Quote:
Originally posted by Desert Fox
William,

I owned two during the late 70's and early 80's, both were station wagons with four banger engines.
Here are a few words and phrases that sum up my experiences with Volvos during that period. Built like a tank. Underpowered and slow. They ran about 80K miles without a problem, then overnight, things started going wrong. The clutch went, the water pump went, and on one of them the entire electrical system had to be replaced. I drove both of them about 120K miles. I never bought another one. My wife loved both of the Volvos. She thought they were the best cars we ever owned. Enough said.

Fred
The above statement can basically be applied verbatim to the volvo my wife owned, including the statement about how much she loved it.

I personally wouldn't own a volvo unless someone bought it for me and promised to pay for the upkeep.

My wife had an 1988 240 DL. It was way underpowered, but it was built like a tank and it was a very nice freeway and around the town car. It got decent gas miliage. Engines on volvos tend to last for ever (kind of like the jeep i-6), it's everything else that craps out all at once.

We had to replace both fuel pumps 2 times. The water pump went out. The alternater died. We had several seal problems with transmission and oil leaks. It had several electrical/mechanical gremlins (one that couldn't be tracked down caused it to stall sometimes). Half the dash would not light up every once in awhile, and then start to work when it wanted to. The trunk would smell like gas every other month, and the leak was never tracked down. The interior plastic wasn't holding up well to Az./Socal weather. The dash cracked in 2 places and several of the plastic pieces like the map holders on the doors were becoming brittle and cracking. When we sold it, the tranny was starting to skip.

This took place from 90k-120K miles.

My wife's parents have owned 2 volvos. Her mom drives a 1996 850 sedan, the one with the 5 cylinder turbo charged engine. In all fairness, that vehicle has been rock solid and has over 120K miles on it. They have had to replace one thing on it, maybe the water pump.

Her father had the larger 960 sedan (same year I think), and it worked fine until 80K and he decided to sell it because it started developing tranny problems.

Anyway, from my personal experience, of buying volvo parts, which are the most expensive I've ever seen ($400 for a rebuilt water pump; the new one from sweden was something like $800) and from dealing with volvo mechanics (which are the most expensive I've ever seen), I would never again own a volvo.

My wife's volvo is why I ended up buying a ford taurus. Just as big, just as safe, and if I'm going to get a "unreliable" vehicle as most people believe of ford, I might as well get a vehicle where the parts and mechanics are cheap. (As an aside, no problems with the taurus at all, going on 5 years old now).
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-08-2003, 04:07 PM
TObject TObject is offline
Reggae
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 7,142
Quote:
Originally posted by speaceman
As an aside, no problems with the taurus at all, going on 5 years old now.
You must be using it wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-08-2003, 04:55 PM
speaceman speaceman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,019

That may be true. Overall, though, I can't say anything bad about Ford. Every ford I have ever owned has worked flawlessly within the 5 or so years that I have owned it.

This taurus has had no problems and I owned a 1994 mustang GT before it and the only problem it had over 6 years was the oil pan seal started to leak at year 5. I talked to the people who bought it from me and they have had 0 problems with it and it's up to 140K miles.

My parents owned an explorer sport for 6 years that only had one thing go wrong with it, which was the clutch throw-out bearing, and that was fixed under warranty.

Our crappy ford though,was a doozy. It was the ford that everyone thinks about when they think about "ford quality". We had an aerostar minivan that worked about 1 week out of every 3. It was always in the shop for one reason or another and finally, after the dealership swapped every peripheral part on the vehicle, and there was nothing left to change, it developed a stalling problem that would occur all the time and the dealership could never track down.

It seems like if you get a good ford, they work fine. If you get the one built on a friday though, watch out. You are in for a world of hurt.

Anyway, I'll take ford over Nissan any day. I had a nissan sentra that worked fine at first, but eventually started developing small problems like oil leaks and small electrical problems, and a clutch that went out every 28K miles to the dot. (I was on my 3rd clutch by the time I sold it). My sister's sentra was newer and she had no problems, though.


(BTW, a lot of my parent's friends drive the gamut of German cars (BMW, Mercedes, Audi) and they are less reliable than their advertising would lead you to believe).
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-08-2003, 05:02 PM
William William is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,277
Well.. it would seem that I'd have to scratch Volvo off the list.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-08-2003, 10:20 PM
speaceman speaceman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,019
Yeah, put it on the do not buy list, under Range Rover, but over Yugo.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-08-2003, 11:21 PM
Paradiddle Paradiddle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 3,190
Shalom - the Aerostar was one of the worst vehicles ever made reliability wise. Ford had nothing but problems with them. Electronics were terrible and they caught fire all the time.

Jeff
__________________
Now I've always been puzzled by the yin and the yang - It'll come out in the wash, but it always leaves a stain
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-08-2003, 11:51 PM
speaceman speaceman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,019
I think my dad would have loved for ours to catch on fire (so long as we weren't in it). We had to end up selling it for some ridiculous amount of money with low miliage and I think it was about 4 years old.

It was a shame, because he liked everything about it design-wise. It was comfortable, had a decent amount of power, had a truck-like suspension so you could actually cary quite a bit of cargo compared to other mini-vans at the time.

We actually drove that thing down to Cabo San Lucas and back during one of the periods in which it had decided to work. It was an awesome road trip, and having the extra room in the aerostar helped out on the long stretches where you were hoping to get to the next town before sundown.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-09-2003, 12:44 AM
Anders Karlsson Anders Karlsson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: La Crescenta, CA
Posts: 142
I have a -93 Aerostar Cargo van with 90k miles, bought it new, it's been running great except for a leaking heater core.

According to the readers of Consumer Reports the Jeep Grand Cherokee is the least reliable vehicle ever made.

My only experience with Volvo's is from the older models, I've owned two and drove a few for a year as a cab driver.
Never had any problems, and If I would have, parts were dirt cheap in Sweden.

William, if you are looking for a reliable car I think we can all agree that Honda and Toyota is the way to go, and if you really want to be a yuppie get the Lexus or Acura.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-15-2003, 11:43 AM
William William is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,277
Quote:
Originally posted by Anders Karlsson
William, if you are looking for a reliable car I think we can all agree that Honda and Toyota is the way to go, and if you really want to be a yuppie get the Lexus or Acura.
None of them make wagons...
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-15-2003, 12:45 PM
mnjeeper mnjeeper is offline
You are my Sunshine, my only sunshine!
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Fargo, Minnesota
Posts: 527
Quote:
Originally posted by William
None of them make wagons...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-15-2003, 01:01 PM
William William is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,277
Quote:
Originally posted by mnjeeper
toyota wagon
To old, guess I should have been a weeee bit more specific.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-15-2003, 01:44 PM
Paradiddle Paradiddle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 3,190
Quote:
Originally posted by William
To old, guess I should have been a weeee bit more specific.
Honda doesn't make the accord wagon anymore?
__________________
Now I've always been puzzled by the yin and the yang - It'll come out in the wash, but it always leaves a stain
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-15-2003, 01:57 PM
TObject TObject is offline
Reggae
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 7,142
Just Coupe and Sedan for the 2004. They do make Element, CR-V, Pilot and Odyssey. There is a dim line between wagons, SUVs and minivans....

This is what looks like the only true wagons, still available new:
Audi A4, A6, S4, S6, quatro
BMW 3 and 5 series
Chevrolet Malibu Maxx
Chrysler PT Cruiser
Chrysler Pacifica
Ford Focus
Ford Taurus
Kia Rio
Lexus IS 300
Mazda Protege 5
Mercedes C and E Class
Mercury Sable
Pontiac Vibe
Saab 9-5
Saturn L Series
Scion xB
Subaru Forester, Impreza, Legacy and Outback
Suzuki Aerio
Toyota Matrix
Volksvagen Jetta and Passat
Volvo V40, V70, and XC70


Still quet a lit to choose from, if you are into that sort of thing.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-15-2003, 02:13 PM
William William is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,277
Too small:

Pontiac Vibe
Chevrolet Malibu Maxx
Chrysler PT Cruiser
Ford Focus
Suzuki Aerio
Toyota Matrix
Scion xB

Overpriced (not sufficient value to me)
Chrysler Pacifica
Audi A4, A6, S4, S6, quatro
BMW 3 and 5 series
Mercedes C and E Class
Volksvagen Jetta and Passat

Just crappy:
Kia Rio
Ford Taurus
Mercury Sable
Saturn L Series

Worth the $ but out of budget:
Lexus IS 300

To many problems:
Subaru Forester, Impreza, Legacy and Outback
Volvo V40, V70, and XC70



Hmmmm
Mazda Protege 5
Saab 9-5



I'm looking at used, under 15k price, 98 or newer, under 50k miles. I've already done the search thing.. Just sorting out the brands.

I had narrowed it to the Subaru Legacy/outbacks, Vovlo V70 (non XC), but hadn't considered Saab's.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-15-2003, 02:15 PM
TObject TObject is offline
Reggae
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 7,142
Are you kidding? Subaru are like the most reliable cars out there. Or so people say...
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-15-2003, 02:21 PM
jeepik jeepik is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 270
Send a message via AIM to jeepik
Quote:
Originally posted by TObject
Are you kidding? Subaru are like the most reliable cars out there. Or so people say...
I concur i have had excellent reliability from Subarus

Volvo is another story, its a ford i wouldnt touch it with a 10 foot stick
__________________
Commy Bastid
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-15-2003, 02:24 PM
William William is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,277
Quote:
Originally posted by TObject
Are you kidding? Subaru are like the most reliable cars out there. Or so people say...
And I would echo that comment, except that a lot of the newer subaru's have had a problem with an exhaust leak into a gaskette that cause's over heating problems. It hits at the 80k mark and later, and the entire engine has to be pulled. At this point, it seems to be a 40% chance. The gaskettes been improved, but it doesn't seem to work either.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-15-2003, 02:34 PM
mrblaine mrblaine is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dana Point, CA USA
Posts: 7,988
Quote:
Originally posted by William
And I would echo that comment, except that a lot of the newer subaru's have had a problem with an exhaust leak into a gaskette that cause's over heating problems. It hits at the 80k mark and later, and the entire engine has to be pulled. At this point, it seems to be a 40% chance. The gaskettes been improved, but it doesn't seem to work either.
Well, that's the darn problem, if they would use gaskets instead of gaskettes, the problem would be solved. Stupid Subaru builders.
__________________
I am Savvy.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
We are not affiliated with Chrysler LLC. Jeep is a registered trademark of Chrysler LLC.
©2001 - 2016, jeepbbs.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy